Led by chairperson Anna-Sophia Lumpe, the burgeoning legal fight hinges on a complex web of labor agreements and emerging European AI regulations. The disputed contracts are rooted in a June 2025 agreement with the local actors’ union, which notably omitted specific remuneration for AI usage because there were no reference points for fair market value.
While Netflix has attempted to de-escalate the tension, characterizing the dispute in a formal letter as a misunderstanding of their technical intentions, they have simultaneously issued an ultimatum: if the actors do not return to the recording booths, Netflix warns it will bypass dubbing entirely, releasing its premium content in Germany with subtitles only.
Rather than creating a precedent by accepting these terms, the VDS has now commissioned specialized law firm Spirit Legal to scrutinize the contracts against data privacy standards, copyright law, and the EU AI Act.
The outcome of the firm’s legal review could set a worldwide benchmark for how human artistry is protected or exploited in the age of language AI. German attorney Ines Duhanic, a specialist in data protection, stated on LinkedIn that she sees “this as a critical moment for European ‘Droit d’auteur’ traditions to stand their ground against aggressive ‘Copyright’ expansion… The stance of the professional associations is clear: They are creators, not data sources.”
Arguably, this is a high-stakes matter for Netflix, where high-quality dubbing became a cornerstone of international revenue this decade. Per the streaming firm’s own What We Watched the Second Half of 2025 report, “Non-English language titles accounted for over a third of all viewing, with Korean, Spanish and Japanese shows and films among the most-watched.”
Editor’s Note: This article was updated on February 17, 2026 to reflect a clarification that the VDS has sought legal review but there is no court case at time of writing.