Remarkably, the contract will not divided into lots or subcontracts and only a single vendor will be awarded. The reason cited for this was to achieve cost savings and economies of scale.
Beyond cost reduction, Britta Aagaard, Head of Translation at Semantix, commented that, “For some time there has been quality issues and lack of transparency in the interpreting market in Denmark – with a lot of negative stories in the press – and this might be an attempt to secure quality and security, alongside with a wish to control the public spend of course.”
The basic requirements for a vendor to qualify for the contract according to the documentation seen by Slator are as follows: The company must have had positive equity and at least DKK 50m (USD 8.3m) in revenue in the most recent financial year. In addition, three referrals for interpreting contracts performed in the past three years with a minimum value of at least DKK 1m (USD 0.17m) each need to be furnished.
One of the vendors in a prime position for this contract is Nordic giant Semantix. The private equity-owned language service provider (LSP) acquired Denmark’s TextMinded in 2017 and in early 2018 bought Norwegian LSP Amesto, pushing combined annual revenues past the USD 120m mark.
“At Semantix we haven’t yet reviewed the requirements but we are used to tenders of this size in Sweden and also Norway and Finland,” Aagaard told Slator.
Cautionary Tale
If a national government aggregating language services demand centered around the judicial sector sounds familiar, it is because the UK’s Ministry of Justice opted for a similar approach back in 2011.
The UK framework contract, however, should serve as a cautionary tale for Denmark. Capita TI, the main provider for the UK contract, was unable to make the contract profitable as it struggled to deliver the services covered under the massive scope and requirements. The company eventually exited the contract and handed over to thebigword, which seems to be able to make money off of it. Government procurement officials and vendors in Denmark would be well advised to look closely into what happened in the UK.
To stay up-to-date on global tenders, subscribe to Slator’s RFP Center and receive daily tender alerts.
Editor’s Note: This article was updated to reflect the comments from Aagaard which arrived in our mailbox after the original publishing date.